Skip to main content

America: Israel's bitch.

This is the comment posted to The National Interest.

          *************************************

I don't see any commenters here who "get it". It's not about oil. It's not about nukes. It's all about Israel. It's the Oded Yinon plan. It's about America being Israel's bitch, and America thus subverted being used to destroy all of Israel's enemies ... so that Israel doesn't have to.


AIPAC owns congress, and the State Department, the US foreign policy shop, is controlled by the Neocon agents of Israel. Which explains why the centerpiece of American foreign policy is the Neocon Wolfowitz Doctrine (Google it): Full Spectrum Dominance, the American jackboot poised over the throat of every nation on the planet ... forever. America: Israel's pitbull bitch ... forever ... or at least until America is used up, having spent every last taxpayer dollar on its military ... for the defense of Israel.

Israel wanted Iraq destroyed. Bush 1 and Bush 2 took care of that. Israel wanted Libya destroyed, Hillary and Obama took care of that. Israel wanted Syria destroyed. Bush and Obama pursued that regime change goal, but in the end were blocked by Russia. They failed to remove Assad, but they pretty much trashed Syria. Now Israel wants Iran destroyed.

Iran doesn't have a nuclear weapons program. That was just an excuse concocted by Israel to get the United States to militarily destroy Iran. The JCPOA was not about (the fantasy of) preventing Iran from getting nukes. Iran was not developing nukes. That was fictional. That was propaganda. The JCPOA was Obama's way of blocking Bibi from manipulating him into a war with Iran.

Now that Iraq is destroyed and Syria is destroyed and Libya is destroyed, Iran remains Israel's last militarily capable adversary.

That's the game here, Bibi's, Adelson's, and the Neocon's game. But it's not going to work, at least not before the 2020 elections ... because Trump knows that a war on Iran will end any chance of his reelection.


So, no war on Iran.


  • Comments

    Popular posts from this blog

    "Terrorism" and other manipulations

    From The Next Big Future, which I believe is Brian Wang's website/blog (I'm new at this stuff) , I find a piece entitled Terrorism is a subset of Murder http://nextbigfuture.com/2011/03/terrorism-is-subset-of-murder.html (asserting, if I get it right, that Terrorism is illegitimate by virtue of being criminal). One commenter, Gigi, responded: As I have already tried to say before, I consider any use of the word “terrorism” more or less pointless. In fact, reading much of the western media about “terrorism” there is almost nowhere any clear definition of the word “terrorism”, for the simple reason that for any kind of such definition many of the military actions taken by the West against unarmed civilians in, say, Iraq or Vietnam may well fall in this definition. Is this an action of terrorism? http://boingboing.net/2010/04/... Simply put it, if Hamas kills one Israeli civilian it is terrorism, if the US or Israel directly kill 10 or more Palestinian it is

    Origins of Covid

    Posted to the comments section of Genetic Literacy Project (and then almost immediately removed as Spam.  But then almost immediately reposted and marked as ***NOT SPAM***.) https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2021/03/25/about-bats-and-covid-why-the-wuhan-lab-leak-theory-shouldnt-be-dismissed-out-of-hand-and-other-reflections-one-year-into-the-crisis/  An aspect of this matter that has not been covered/mentioned, even by Ron Unz in his review: Twenty years ago, witnessing the rise of China with double digit GDP growth, and the rapid Neoliberal transfer of manufacturing to China, I thought to myself that the US could only recover competitiveness and the US jobs that were then being moved to China, in (***only***) one of two ways: (1) Nuke China "back to the stone age" (radical in the extreme, as well as "impractical" because of China's nuclear deterrent, and because the barbaric severity would have correspondingly severe global political implications). Clearly too

    The future of the Zionist "project".

    You're right about Herzl being dead at the time of the Balfour Declaration. But that's just a quibble. The killer, thieving, lying Zionists intended from day one to take all of Palestine, "disappear" the Palestinians, and "deal with" anyone who got in their way. This is the pattern of five-thousand years which has always brought reaction and grief for the Jews. In the post-Holocaust era it was the height of political incorrectness to notice the pattern, and suggest that Jewish misbehavior was the source of anti-Jewish "persecution" -- blowback really -- down the ages. Now the internet has opened a gap in the Zionist propaganda, and the truth has flowed out for all the world to see. In full view of the world we see killer Zionists sitting on sofas on a hill overlooking Gaza watching the mass slaughter, and celebrating. This is the nature of the Jewish power elite. And somehow they think no one will notice their barbarism. Nukes or no nukes