Skip to main content

The (((truth)))) you are not allowed to tell.

Below is my reply to a “Jackie Chiles for president” comment to this article on antiwar.com:

https://news.antiwar.com/2024/05/16/zelensky-blames-the-world-for-russias-kharkiv-offensive/

Here is the "Jackie Chiles for president" comment:

"Anyone that's not Russian on here, or paid by the Chinese? This place is scary, can we at least add a few pacifists, Nazi's, nihilist's and communists to balance the dialogue? RFK? I'm not even sure what he is. I'm against senseless wars and wasted national budgets to fund a war for elitist interests too but not at the cost of a world run by Xi and Putin. If you cheer lead those clowns, seek help."What kind of an idiot are you? Where does this insane hostility towards Xi and Putin come from? ... that you've swallowed hook line and sinker?"

... and below is my response.  The issue which provokes my preserving and publishing the comment here is the series of triple parentheses, which are indications that the word in parentheses indicates a Jewish identity.


My comment managed to stay up for a few days before the moderator noticed the “the problem” and removed it .... because of the parentheses. The comment was then deleted by the moderator. As a response to that deletion I copied the comment, removed the parentheses, and reposted it.


Here is my common in the original form, with the parentheses.


"Putin rescued Russia from the clutches of the (((oligarchs))) and the (((neocons))), bringing it out of the depths of despair to be restored to the powerful and prosperous country it is today.

And he accomplished his rescue despite the determined effort by (((western forces))) to destroy, humiliate, and loot Russia. Simultaneous with his rescue of Russia he enabled European prosperity by selling them substantial quantities of cheap, clean natural gas via the Nordstream pipeline, a gift of mutual prosperity that Putin/Russia was about to expand by doubling the gift of cheap energy with the opening of Nordstream 2.

Instead, the (((Wolfowitz doctrine))) led the once prosperous West to the slaughter ... on the altar of war, economic collapse, and cultural degeneracy.

But not Russia ... and not China.

In short, Putin is the preeminent statesman on the world stage today. Would that we had such capable leadership.

And as to Xi, he is without question the preeminent technocratic leader of the modern age. The miracle wrought in China by Deng Xiaoping and Xi is of a scale and character unprecedented in the history of humanity.

But somehow, your addled brain has been filled with a lot of China- and Russia-hating nonsense. It's not an accident and it's not a mystery: the (((Western media))) has brainwashed you.

The good news is that a new world is emerging led by the BRICS+ and "the global south". The Europeans will bail on (((the predators))) and join that new order, and when the US has hit rock bottom it too will shed (((the predators))) and begin again.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

9/11: Saudis, Israelis, and Zionist captivity

From:  Sens. Graham, McCain Unveil Plan to Weaken Saudi 9/11 Bill http://news.antiwar.com/2016/11/30/sens-graham-mccain-unveil-plan-to-weaken-saudi-911-bill/ My reply to pensword re Saudi/Israeli involvement in 9/11: I agree, both the Saudi and Israeli govts were involved: the Saudis in financing and the Israelis in "shepherding". A separate, overarching, and much more difficult matter however, is the subversion of the US govt by the Israelis. The Neocons -- Israeli agents -- currently control the Executive(Trump may boot them, we shall see.), and AIPAC -- Israeli agents -- has for many years maintained ownership of the House and Senate. Breaking out of Zionist "captivity" is a yuuuge challenge. Consider, its mention is taboo in the MSM media, dangerous in the alternate media, and a life destroying, career-killing offense in politics, media, academia, commerce,... hell, across the spectrum of civil and cultural participation. The Jews have once aga...

"Terrorism" and other manipulations

From The Next Big Future, which I believe is Brian Wang's website/blog (I'm new at this stuff) , I find a piece entitled Terrorism is a subset of Murder http://nextbigfuture.com/2011/03/terrorism-is-subset-of-murder.html (asserting, if I get it right, that Terrorism is illegitimate by virtue of being criminal). One commenter, Gigi, responded: As I have already tried to say before, I consider any use of the word “terrorism” more or less pointless. In fact, reading much of the western media about “terrorism” there is almost nowhere any clear definition of the word “terrorism”, for the simple reason that for any kind of such definition many of the military actions taken by the West against unarmed civilians in, say, Iraq or Vietnam may well fall in this definition. Is this an action of terrorism? http://boingboing.net/2010/04/... Simply put it, if Hamas kills one Israeli civilian it is terrorism, if the US or Israel directly kill 10 or more Palestinian it is ...