Skip to main content

A Full-blown Cultural War

Thought police.
First they cut off Wikileaks from funding, then they came for Julian Assange. Then they demonitized alternative media on YouTube. Then the FBI came after alternative media -- Antiwar.com and Justin Raimondo "investigated". Then Antiwar's own Scott Horton erased from Twitter (and Facebook?) along with Alex Jones and a "turncoat" NYT investigative reporter.
You would think this would inspire AW.C to defend freedom of speech. But no, the thought police are here as well. Don't think of criticizing the .... (not allowed to write the name.)
You can find the "offending" material at .... (but no, not allowed even to tell you that.)
AW.C: cowed, if not owned, by the Hasbara.
For twenty years AW.C has been at the top of my bookmarks, and the first place I go each day to check on the inspiring lack of human progress.
I'd like to hear from Justin. Defend this policy. Why are you allowing the same abuses to which you and AW.C have been subjected, to be practiced here on AW.C?
And one other thing. Why is it that "Jake", the Hasbara rep currently assigned to AW.C, cannot be blocked? Check it out, you'll see that it's true. What's that about? Does he come in through a "backdoor" not owned by Disqus?
  • Comments

    Popular posts from this blog

    "Terrorism" and other manipulations

    From The Next Big Future, which I believe is Brian Wang's website/blog (I'm new at this stuff) , I find a piece entitled Terrorism is a subset of Murder http://nextbigfuture.com/2011/03/terrorism-is-subset-of-murder.html (asserting, if I get it right, that Terrorism is illegitimate by virtue of being criminal). One commenter, Gigi, responded: As I have already tried to say before, I consider any use of the word “terrorism” more or less pointless. In fact, reading much of the western media about “terrorism” there is almost nowhere any clear definition of the word “terrorism”, for the simple reason that for any kind of such definition many of the military actions taken by the West against unarmed civilians in, say, Iraq or Vietnam may well fall in this definition. Is this an action of terrorism? http://boingboing.net/2010/04/... Simply put it, if Hamas kills one Israeli civilian it is terrorism, if the US or Israel directly kill 10 or more Palestinian it is

    Origins of Covid

    Posted to the comments section of Genetic Literacy Project (and then almost immediately removed as Spam.  But then almost immediately reposted and marked as ***NOT SPAM***.) https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2021/03/25/about-bats-and-covid-why-the-wuhan-lab-leak-theory-shouldnt-be-dismissed-out-of-hand-and-other-reflections-one-year-into-the-crisis/  An aspect of this matter that has not been covered/mentioned, even by Ron Unz in his review: Twenty years ago, witnessing the rise of China with double digit GDP growth, and the rapid Neoliberal transfer of manufacturing to China, I thought to myself that the US could only recover competitiveness and the US jobs that were then being moved to China, in (***only***) one of two ways: (1) Nuke China "back to the stone age" (radical in the extreme, as well as "impractical" because of China's nuclear deterrent, and because the barbaric severity would have correspondingly severe global political implications). Clearly too

    Ethics vs tribal criminality

    Israel is a geopolitical crime-in-progress. No crime has a right to exist, no criminals in the commission of a crime have the right to self-defense. They have the right to surrender to a competent authority, have the "issue" adjudicated by a fair judicial authority, and if found guilty to be subject to a proportionate penalty, and after having served their time, permitted once again to participate in lawful society. The greatest existential threat to Israel,... is Israel. I'm an American and a Jew, just not a supporter Zionist or American criminality. You, on the other hand appear to be utterly untouched by any taint of ethics outside criminal tribalism. Sad. Small detail: the Saudi oil production facilities can be destroyed with conventional explosives. Nukes not necessary.