Skip to main content

The Zio-Mind-F*ck "Moderated" from AW.C 1/17/2019

The Zionists -- all of them, all across the world -- in furtherance of Zionist criminality -- are experts at disinformation, distraction, delay, and diversion -- or, to coin a phrase: The Zio-Mind-F*ck. ***Israel's*** channel 13 broadcasts some bs, and immediately the Goyim start "discussing" it as if it was something real, rather than just the next chapter in the ongoing effort to keep the Goyim fussing about, as the Zionist plan progresses, unimpeded. In "The Boy Who Cried Wolf" the villagers eventually caught on. The Goyim are slower. As deganawida writes, "Israel wants it all-100%". Exactly. And they will have it all, eventually, and "Arab rein" to boot. But if the pattern of five-thousand years of history is any indication, the Zionist zealots, unable to restrain themselves, will overreach, and once again suffer some form of "setback".

ADDENDUM:

You can see my lengthy exchange -- some of it at least -- with the moderator regarding his self-indulgent, self-important interference in freedom of expression here on AW.C. Fine. There is dog sh*t in the world, it's just part of reality, one needs to watch where they step. But in the process of harassing me for speaking the truth in my own terms, he has revealed the source of "his problem" with my post. I commonly used, the Jewish term used by ***some*** Jews to describe non-Jews as sub-human "cattle" put on the earth to serve the Jews. A common term widely used and widely known. Thomas describes it as an ethnic slur. Fair enough. Thomas avers thereby that ***some of*** the Jews by their common usage of the term, are supremacist bigots. That works for me. Now that I know Thomas's problem with my post, I can "sanitize" it to make it "acceptable" to the censor. Here it is, sanitized as indicated by [bracketed] content: The Zionists -- all of them, all across the world -- in furtherance of Zionist criminality -- are experts at disinformation, distraction, delay, and diversion -- or, to coin a phrase: The Zio-Mind-F*ck. ***Israel's*** channel 13 broadcasts some bs, and immediately the [the Jewish term used by ***some*** Jews to describe non-Jews as sub-human "cattle" put on the earth to serve the Jews] start "discussing" it as if it was something real, rather than just the next chapter in the ongoing effort to keep the [the Jewish term used by ***some*** Jews to describe non-Jews as sub-human "cattle" put on the earth to serve the Jews] fussing about, as the Zionist plan progresses, unimpeded. In "The Boy Who Cried Wolf" the villagers eventually caught on. The [the Jewish term used by ***some*** Jews to describe non-Jews as sub-human "cattle" put on the earth to serve the Jews] are slower. As deganawida writes, "Israel wants it all-100%". Exactly. And they will have it all, eventually, and "Arab rein" to boot. But if the pattern of five-thousand years of history is any indication, the Zionist zealots, unable to restrain themselves, will overreach, and once again suffer some form of "setback".

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

re censorship at antiwar.com

Really, Thomas? Who is the drama queen here? You're embarrassing yourself with this name calling. My comment disappeared. What am I to think, you're on a coffee break? So I posted the link to my backup, my all-but-invisible, low-traffic,... make that no-traffic,... blog. The "rules" you cite give the Jews a free pass on their complicity in the Zionist project. It's ok to criticize Zionism or Israel, but not the Jews that make their crimes possible. That appears to be the rule, and it amounts to Antiwar.com caving to Jewish/Zionist intimidation. It may be discretion -- as in "discretion is the better part of valor" -- but absent the lethality of bullets-and-bombs-combat, it's cowardly. It was cowardly then, as it is cowardly now. That said, it ***IS*** Justin's website and he gets to decide on when "discretion" -- strategic restraint -- is called for. I've had this issue since before you were moderator. Someone Jewis...

Right to exist, right to self-defense.....not!

The following is a post I made to The Algemeiner, an online Jewish publication, in response to "Golda Meir was no J-Streeter", http://www.algemeiner.com/2015/09/08/golda-meir-was-no-j-streeter/#comment-4474211. Like many Jewish publications The Algemeiner has a limited tolerance for the truth when the truth is critical of Israel and its supporters, and so, not surprisingly, the comment was deleted by "moderation". I reprint it here for your consideration. ************************** Make no mistake, I’m an American and a Jew. For those of you thoroughly infected with the Judiasm-destroying poison of Zionism, here is the antidote to your Kool-aid dreams. Drink deeply and wake up to reality. We often hear the phrase “Israel’s right to exist” and along with it, “Israel’s right to self-defense.” Hear them endlessly, by propagandists who repeat them endlessly. But endless repetition does not make a thing true. The phantom “legiti...

Political Self-Immolation

"What is relevant is Donald Jr's INTENT. In his email response (I am paraphrasing, but you can verify) he says, if the offer of dirt on Hillary is true, I love it! The intent behind this statement is loud and clear." I agree with you that this is the heart of the matter, and like you I am surprised that the so few of the anti-Trump people have zeroed in on this crucial element. Good on you for bringing it front and center. Let's take a look. Trump jr gets an email that says, "We've got dirt on HRC from the Russian govt, and we want to share it with you as part of Russia/Putin's effort to help Trump win the presidency." (This may not be absolutely the precise wording, but this will be the most aggressive/damning "parsing".) Then Trump jr says, "I love it, bring it on." This will be spun as Trump jr declaring his willingness and his INTENT (your caps) to collude, and as the very first substantive act in the process of collusi...