Skip to main content

the crypto-entrepreneurial renaissance

The SEC is essentially a criminal organization. It has comprehensively betrayed its mandate to become a textbook example of Regulatory Capture, and is now a wholly-owned subsidiary of Wall Street, City of London, the Rothschild Group, et al. Though FDR sought to create it for the purpose of restoring confidence in the US capital markets and protecting investors, it was never really about that. The Wall Street criminals FDR hired for that purpose simply built a monopoly for themselves so that they could have exclusive control of global money flows
I submit as evidence of the SEC's criminality its 'asleep at the switch' performance in failing to police the Wall Street investment banks in their issuance of Mortgage-Backed Securities leading up to the 2008 housing market meltdown.
They are now the enforcement arm of international capital's monopoly on global money flows. No one can issue a security -- under threat of financial destruction and/or imprisonment -- unless they pay Wall Street their extortion. 'Free enterprise' isn't free at all, but rather under the firm control of the Malefactors of Great Wealth. They are your owners.
***YOU HAVE OWNERS. THEY OWN YOU!***
The good news however, is that the cryptocurrency phenomenon is breaking Wall Street's monopoly on global money flows, by creating an ***AUTOMATED*** digital financial instrument issuance and transaction ledger mechanism which entirely bypasses Wall Street, and at costs in the hundreds rather than millions of dollars. The SEC/Wall Street is fighting to suppress cryptos, but the technology and economics make it inevitable that Wall Street will lose that battle. Finance capitalism is on the brink of an entrepreneurial explosion fueled by the crypto-driven liberation of capital creation.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

9/11: Saudis, Israelis, and Zionist captivity

From:  Sens. Graham, McCain Unveil Plan to Weaken Saudi 9/11 Bill http://news.antiwar.com/2016/11/30/sens-graham-mccain-unveil-plan-to-weaken-saudi-911-bill/ My reply to pensword re Saudi/Israeli involvement in 9/11: I agree, both the Saudi and Israeli govts were involved: the Saudis in financing and the Israelis in "shepherding". A separate, overarching, and much more difficult matter however, is the subversion of the US govt by the Israelis. The Neocons -- Israeli agents -- currently control the Executive(Trump may boot them, we shall see.), and AIPAC -- Israeli agents -- has for many years maintained ownership of the House and Senate. Breaking out of Zionist "captivity" is a yuuuge challenge. Consider, its mention is taboo in the MSM media, dangerous in the alternate media, and a life destroying, career-killing offense in politics, media, academia, commerce,... hell, across the spectrum of civil and cultural participation. The Jews have once aga...

The (((truth)))) you are not allowed to tell.

Below is my reply to a “Jackie Chiles for president”  comment to this article on antiwar.com: https://news.antiwar.com/2024/05/16/zelensky-blames-the-world-for-russias-kharkiv-offensive/ Here is the "Jackie Chiles for president" comment: "Anyone that's not Russian on here, or paid by the Chinese? This place is scary, can we at least add a few pacifists, Nazi's, nihilist's and communists to balance the dialogue? RFK? I'm not even sure what he is. I'm against senseless wars and wasted national budgets to fund a war for elitist interests too but not at the cost of a world run by Xi and Putin. If you cheer lead those clowns, seek help. "What kind of an idiot are you? Where does this insane hostility towards Xi and Putin come from? ... that you've swallowed hook line and sinker?" ... and below is my response.  The issue which provokes my preserving and publishing the comment here is the series of triple parentheses, which are indications that...

re censorship at antiwar.com

Really, Thomas? Who is the drama queen here? You're embarrassing yourself with this name calling. My comment disappeared. What am I to think, you're on a coffee break? So I posted the link to my backup, my all-but-invisible, low-traffic,... make that no-traffic,... blog. The "rules" you cite give the Jews a free pass on their complicity in the Zionist project. It's ok to criticize Zionism or Israel, but not the Jews that make their crimes possible. That appears to be the rule, and it amounts to Antiwar.com caving to Jewish/Zionist intimidation. It may be discretion -- as in "discretion is the better part of valor" -- but absent the lethality of bullets-and-bombs-combat, it's cowardly. It was cowardly then, as it is cowardly now. That said, it ***IS*** Justin's website and he gets to decide on when "discretion" -- strategic restraint -- is called for. I've had this issue since before you were moderator. Someone Jewis...