Skip to main content

the crypto-entrepreneurial renaissance

The SEC is essentially a criminal organization. It has comprehensively betrayed its mandate to become a textbook example of Regulatory Capture, and is now a wholly-owned subsidiary of Wall Street, City of London, the Rothschild Group, et al. Though FDR sought to create it for the purpose of restoring confidence in the US capital markets and protecting investors, it was never really about that. The Wall Street criminals FDR hired for that purpose simply built a monopoly for themselves so that they could have exclusive control of global money flows
I submit as evidence of the SEC's criminality its 'asleep at the switch' performance in failing to police the Wall Street investment banks in their issuance of Mortgage-Backed Securities leading up to the 2008 housing market meltdown.
They are now the enforcement arm of international capital's monopoly on global money flows. No one can issue a security -- under threat of financial destruction and/or imprisonment -- unless they pay Wall Street their extortion. 'Free enterprise' isn't free at all, but rather under the firm control of the Malefactors of Great Wealth. They are your owners.
***YOU HAVE OWNERS. THEY OWN YOU!***
The good news however, is that the cryptocurrency phenomenon is breaking Wall Street's monopoly on global money flows, by creating an ***AUTOMATED*** digital financial instrument issuance and transaction ledger mechanism which entirely bypasses Wall Street, and at costs in the hundreds rather than millions of dollars. The SEC/Wall Street is fighting to suppress cryptos, but the technology and economics make it inevitable that Wall Street will lose that battle. Finance capitalism is on the brink of an entrepreneurial explosion fueled by the crypto-driven liberation of capital creation.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

re censorship at antiwar.com

Really, Thomas? Who is the drama queen here? You're embarrassing yourself with this name calling. My comment disappeared. What am I to think, you're on a coffee break? So I posted the link to my backup, my all-but-invisible, low-traffic,... make that no-traffic,... blog. The "rules" you cite give the Jews a free pass on their complicity in the Zionist project. It's ok to criticize Zionism or Israel, but not the Jews that make their crimes possible. That appears to be the rule, and it amounts to Antiwar.com caving to Jewish/Zionist intimidation. It may be discretion -- as in "discretion is the better part of valor" -- but absent the lethality of bullets-and-bombs-combat, it's cowardly. It was cowardly then, as it is cowardly now. That said, it ***IS*** Justin's website and he gets to decide on when "discretion" -- strategic restraint -- is called for. I've had this issue since before you were moderator. Someone Jewis...
Post a Comment
Read more

Right to exist, right to self-defense.....not!

The following is a post I made to The Algemeiner, an online Jewish publication, in response to "Golda Meir was no J-Streeter", http://www.algemeiner.com/2015/09/08/golda-meir-was-no-j-streeter/#comment-4474211. Like many Jewish publications The Algemeiner has a limited tolerance for the truth when the truth is critical of Israel and its supporters, and so, not surprisingly, the comment was deleted by "moderation". I reprint it here for your consideration. ************************** Make no mistake, I’m an American and a Jew. For those of you thoroughly infected with the Judiasm-destroying poison of Zionism, here is the antidote to your Kool-aid dreams. Drink deeply and wake up to reality. We often hear the phrase “Israel’s right to exist” and along with it, “Israel’s right to self-defense.” Hear them endlessly, by propagandists who repeat them endlessly. But endless repetition does not make a thing true. The phantom “legiti...
Post a Comment
Read more

Political Self-Immolation

"What is relevant is Donald Jr's INTENT. In his email response (I am paraphrasing, but you can verify) he says, if the offer of dirt on Hillary is true, I love it! The intent behind this statement is loud and clear." I agree with you that this is the heart of the matter, and like you I am surprised that the so few of the anti-Trump people have zeroed in on this crucial element. Good on you for bringing it front and center. Let's take a look. Trump jr gets an email that says, "We've got dirt on HRC from the Russian govt, and we want to share it with you as part of Russia/Putin's effort to help Trump win the presidency." (This may not be absolutely the precise wording, but this will be the most aggressive/damning "parsing".) Then Trump jr says, "I love it, bring it on." This will be spun as Trump jr declaring his willingness and his INTENT (your caps) to collude, and as the very first substantive act in the process of collusi...
Post a Comment
Read more