Skip to main content

The Zio-Mind-F*ck "Moderated" from AW.C 1/17/2019

The Zionists -- all of them, all across the world -- in furtherance of Zionist criminality -- are experts at disinformation, distraction, delay, and diversion -- or, to coin a phrase: The Zio-Mind-F*ck. ***Israel's*** channel 13 broadcasts some bs, and immediately the Goyim start "discussing" it as if it was something real, rather than just the next chapter in the ongoing effort to keep the Goyim fussing about, as the Zionist plan progresses, unimpeded. In "The Boy Who Cried Wolf" the villagers eventually caught on. The Goyim are slower. As deganawida writes, "Israel wants it all-100%". Exactly. And they will have it all, eventually, and "Arab rein" to boot. But if the pattern of five-thousand years of history is any indication, the Zionist zealots, unable to restrain themselves, will overreach, and once again suffer some form of "setback".

ADDENDUM:

You can see my lengthy exchange -- some of it at least -- with the moderator regarding his self-indulgent, self-important interference in freedom of expression here on AW.C. Fine. There is dog sh*t in the world, it's just part of reality, one needs to watch where they step. But in the process of harassing me for speaking the truth in my own terms, he has revealed the source of "his problem" with my post. I commonly used, the Jewish term used by ***some*** Jews to describe non-Jews as sub-human "cattle" put on the earth to serve the Jews. A common term widely used and widely known. Thomas describes it as an ethnic slur. Fair enough. Thomas avers thereby that ***some of*** the Jews by their common usage of the term, are supremacist bigots. That works for me. Now that I know Thomas's problem with my post, I can "sanitize" it to make it "acceptable" to the censor. Here it is, sanitized as indicated by [bracketed] content: The Zionists -- all of them, all across the world -- in furtherance of Zionist criminality -- are experts at disinformation, distraction, delay, and diversion -- or, to coin a phrase: The Zio-Mind-F*ck. ***Israel's*** channel 13 broadcasts some bs, and immediately the [the Jewish term used by ***some*** Jews to describe non-Jews as sub-human "cattle" put on the earth to serve the Jews] start "discussing" it as if it was something real, rather than just the next chapter in the ongoing effort to keep the [the Jewish term used by ***some*** Jews to describe non-Jews as sub-human "cattle" put on the earth to serve the Jews] fussing about, as the Zionist plan progresses, unimpeded. In "The Boy Who Cried Wolf" the villagers eventually caught on. The [the Jewish term used by ***some*** Jews to describe non-Jews as sub-human "cattle" put on the earth to serve the Jews] are slower. As deganawida writes, "Israel wants it all-100%". Exactly. And they will have it all, eventually, and "Arab rein" to boot. But if the pattern of five-thousand years of history is any indication, the Zionist zealots, unable to restrain themselves, will overreach, and once again suffer some form of "setback".

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The (((truth)))) you are not allowed to tell.

Below is my reply to a “Jackie Chiles for president”  comment to this article on antiwar.com: https://news.antiwar.com/2024/05/16/zelensky-blames-the-world-for-russias-kharkiv-offensive/ Here is the "Jackie Chiles for president" comment: "Anyone that's not Russian on here, or paid by the Chinese? This place is scary, can we at least add a few pacifists, Nazi's, nihilist's and communists to balance the dialogue? RFK? I'm not even sure what he is. I'm against senseless wars and wasted national budgets to fund a war for elitist interests too but not at the cost of a world run by Xi and Putin. If you cheer lead those clowns, seek help. "What kind of an idiot are you? Where does this insane hostility towards Xi and Putin come from? ... that you've swallowed hook line and sinker?" ... and below is my response.  The issue which provokes my preserving and publishing the comment here is the series of triple parentheses, which are indications that...

"Terrorism" and other manipulations

From The Next Big Future, which I believe is Brian Wang's website/blog (I'm new at this stuff) , I find a piece entitled Terrorism is a subset of Murder http://nextbigfuture.com/2011/03/terrorism-is-subset-of-murder.html (asserting, if I get it right, that Terrorism is illegitimate by virtue of being criminal). One commenter, Gigi, responded: As I have already tried to say before, I consider any use of the word “terrorism” more or less pointless. In fact, reading much of the western media about “terrorism” there is almost nowhere any clear definition of the word “terrorism”, for the simple reason that for any kind of such definition many of the military actions taken by the West against unarmed civilians in, say, Iraq or Vietnam may well fall in this definition. Is this an action of terrorism? http://boingboing.net/2010/04/... Simply put it, if Hamas kills one Israeli civilian it is terrorism, if the US or Israel directly kill 10 or more Palestinian it is ...

Bradley Manning and the Nuremberg Principles

Nuremberg Principle I Principle I states, "Any person who commits an act which constitutes a crime under international law is responsible therefor and liable to punishment." Principle II Principle II states, "The fact that internal law does not impose a penalty for an act which constitutes a crime under international law does not relieve the person who committed the act from responsibility under international law." Principle III Principle III states, "The fact that a person who committed an act which constitutes a crime under international law acted as Head of State or responsible government official does not relieve him from responsibility under international law." Principle IV Principle IV states: "The fact that a person acted pursuant to order of his Government or of a superior does not relieve him from responsibility under international law, provided a moral choice was in fact possible to him". This principle could be paraphra...