Skip to main content

The (((truth)))) you are not allowed to tell.

Below is my reply to a “Jackie Chiles for president” comment to this article on antiwar.com:

https://news.antiwar.com/2024/05/16/zelensky-blames-the-world-for-russias-kharkiv-offensive/

Here is the "Jackie Chiles for president" comment:

"Anyone that's not Russian on here, or paid by the Chinese? This place is scary, can we at least add a few pacifists, Nazi's, nihilist's and communists to balance the dialogue? RFK? I'm not even sure what he is. I'm against senseless wars and wasted national budgets to fund a war for elitist interests too but not at the cost of a world run by Xi and Putin. If you cheer lead those clowns, seek help."What kind of an idiot are you? Where does this insane hostility towards Xi and Putin come from? ... that you've swallowed hook line and sinker?"

... and below is my response.  The issue which provokes my preserving and publishing the comment here is the series of triple parentheses, which are indications that the word in parentheses indicates a Jewish identity.


My comment managed to stay up for a few days before the moderator noticed the “the problem” and removed it .... because of the parentheses. The comment was then deleted by the moderator. As a response to that deletion I copied the comment, removed the parentheses, and reposted it.


Here is my common in the original form, with the parentheses.


"Putin rescued Russia from the clutches of the (((oligarchs))) and the (((neocons))), bringing it out of the depths of despair to be restored to the powerful and prosperous country it is today.

And he accomplished his rescue despite the determined effort by (((western forces))) to destroy, humiliate, and loot Russia. Simultaneous with his rescue of Russia he enabled European prosperity by selling them substantial quantities of cheap, clean natural gas via the Nordstream pipeline, a gift of mutual prosperity that Putin/Russia was about to expand by doubling the gift of cheap energy with the opening of Nordstream 2.

Instead, the (((Wolfowitz doctrine))) led the once prosperous West to the slaughter ... on the altar of war, economic collapse, and cultural degeneracy.

But not Russia ... and not China.

In short, Putin is the preeminent statesman on the world stage today. Would that we had such capable leadership.

And as to Xi, he is without question the preeminent technocratic leader of the modern age. The miracle wrought in China by Deng Xiaoping and Xi is of a scale and character unprecedented in the history of humanity.

But somehow, your addled brain has been filled with a lot of China- and Russia-hating nonsense. It's not an accident and it's not a mystery: the (((Western media))) has brainwashed you.

The good news is that a new world is emerging led by the BRICS+ and "the global south". The Europeans will bail on (((the predators))) and join that new order, and when the US has hit rock bottom it too will shed (((the predators))) and begin again.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Terrorism" and other manipulations

From The Next Big Future, which I believe is Brian Wang's website/blog (I'm new at this stuff) , I find a piece entitled Terrorism is a subset of Murder http://nextbigfuture.com/2011/03/terrorism-is-subset-of-murder.html (asserting, if I get it right, that Terrorism is illegitimate by virtue of being criminal). One commenter, Gigi, responded: As I have already tried to say before, I consider any use of the word “terrorism” more or less pointless. In fact, reading much of the western media about “terrorism” there is almost nowhere any clear definition of the word “terrorism”, for the simple reason that for any kind of such definition many of the military actions taken by the West against unarmed civilians in, say, Iraq or Vietnam may well fall in this definition. Is this an action of terrorism? http://boingboing.net/2010/04/... Simply put it, if Hamas kills one Israeli civilian it is terrorism, if the US or Israel directly kill 10 or more Palestinian it is
2 comments
Read more

The movement to free Julian Assange

In response to a similar comment by  ISHKABIBBLE   /   FEBRUARY 18, 2019 on Caitlin Johnstone's Website: https://caitlinjohnstone.com/2019/02/18/watch-my-speech-on-assanges-persecution-for-whistle-blowing-wikileaks-the-future-of-democracy/#comment-9130 I am comprehensively in agreement with you. For the last two or three years, I have entertained the same idea. So let me now expand on your — and my — suggestion. First of all, this undertaking should be done completely out in the open. There should be no secrecy involved. It should be a mass, overt, worldwide effort, with invitations to assemble in London for the event sent out to all those who support Assange. There should be no question whatsoever that it is an in-your-face repudiation and challenge to the British “Establishment”/Deep State. The action would be nothing less than a “Declaration of Independence” issued by the people of the world against the craven and unlawful imprisonment of by the UK of Assang
Post a Comment
Read more

Ethics vs tribal criminality

Israel is a geopolitical crime-in-progress. No crime has a right to exist, no criminals in the commission of a crime have the right to self-defense. They have the right to surrender to a competent authority, have the "issue" adjudicated by a fair judicial authority, and if found guilty to be subject to a proportionate penalty, and after having served their time, permitted once again to participate in lawful society. The greatest existential threat to Israel,... is Israel. I'm an American and a Jew, just not a supporter Zionist or American criminality. You, on the other hand appear to be utterly untouched by any taint of ethics outside criminal tribalism. Sad. Small detail: the Saudi oil production facilities can be destroyed with conventional explosives. Nukes not necessary.
Post a Comment
Read more