Skip to main content

Posted and then" removed" from comments to "Biden’s Top Asia Official Says US Engagement With China Is Over" at Antiwar.com

 Thomas,

Why was this removed when first posted? Is it the Unz reference or link? If you will point out the problem, I will fix it.

Or perhaps it wasn't you, but rather the same unseen hand that has "automatically", almost comprehensively, removed/cancelled/disappeared The Unz Review commentary from all social media ... and perhaps now Disqus as well?

******************

Here's the original post, with the Unz link replaced by the essay's title.

********************

"The" lab? Which lab is "the" lab? You of course mean the Wuhan lab, but really, is that "the" lab?

How about the North Carolina lab that Fauci admitted in Congressional testimony was doing Gain of Function research on bat corona viruses?

This discussion is infuriatingly -- despairingly might be a better descriptive -- infected by propagandized biases and media-generated, "perception management" reality alienation.

Angry as I am -- I'm tempted to slam all you guys as being unbearably stupid -- but I can't, because we live in a post-truth era with everyone victimized by spook-and-media executed "brain rape" on behalf of the ruling class. So everyone is blameless in their confusion.

Recall what William Casey, Ronald Reagon's CIA Director said: "We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false."

MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!!!

Does anyone believe that our war-mongering death merchants would ever willingly give up their quest for world conquest by any means, ie a bioweapon, if a bioweapon looked to be enabling?

When The Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) entered into force on 26 March 1975, those death merchants would have modified their approach, and rebranded bioweapons development as Gain of Function research, "explaining" it as necessary, as "defensive", as permitted. As a means of "understanding the danger and preparing a defense against a (real or manufactured) epidemic." After all, those sneaky commies were certainly going to take advantage, and continue THEIR evil work ... in secret. (Talk about projection!)

Enter psychopathic death merchant Pompeo under Trump: first as CIA Director and then as Sec of State.

So if you want to talk investigations and lack of cooperation, try getting samples and a full record of the GoF research, from the Carolina lab and the Wuhan lab, (and the Mossad labs), in order to compare the genetic codes of the bat corona viruses of the various samples to those of the Wuhan and Iranian outbreaks. Then, having attempted this ***genuinely comprehensive*** investigation -- not just a fraudulent investigation designed to brand China responsible -- then, we can talk about "cooperation", and "falsifiability".

Till then, I'm going with Ron Unz and so should you: Breaking the Silence on the Origins of Covid-19

    • Comments

    Post a Comment

    Popular posts from this blog

    9/11: Saudis, Israelis, and Zionist captivity

    From:  Sens. Graham, McCain Unveil Plan to Weaken Saudi 9/11 Bill http://news.antiwar.com/2016/11/30/sens-graham-mccain-unveil-plan-to-weaken-saudi-911-bill/ My reply to pensword re Saudi/Israeli involvement in 9/11: I agree, both the Saudi and Israeli govts were involved: the Saudis in financing and the Israelis in "shepherding". A separate, overarching, and much more difficult matter however, is the subversion of the US govt by the Israelis. The Neocons -- Israeli agents -- currently control the Executive(Trump may boot them, we shall see.), and AIPAC -- Israeli agents -- has for many years maintained ownership of the House and Senate. Breaking out of Zionist "captivity" is a yuuuge challenge. Consider, its mention is taboo in the MSM media, dangerous in the alternate media, and a life destroying, career-killing offense in politics, media, academia, commerce,... hell, across the spectrum of civil and cultural participation. The Jews have once aga...
    Post a Comment
    Read more

    re censorship at antiwar.com

    Really, Thomas? Who is the drama queen here? You're embarrassing yourself with this name calling. My comment disappeared. What am I to think, you're on a coffee break? So I posted the link to my backup, my all-but-invisible, low-traffic,... make that no-traffic,... blog. The "rules" you cite give the Jews a free pass on their complicity in the Zionist project. It's ok to criticize Zionism or Israel, but not the Jews that make their crimes possible. That appears to be the rule, and it amounts to Antiwar.com caving to Jewish/Zionist intimidation. It may be discretion -- as in "discretion is the better part of valor" -- but absent the lethality of bullets-and-bombs-combat, it's cowardly. It was cowardly then, as it is cowardly now. That said, it ***IS*** Justin's website and he gets to decide on when "discretion" -- strategic restraint -- is called for. I've had this issue since before you were moderator. Someone Jewis...
    Post a Comment
    Read more

    The (((truth)))) you are not allowed to tell.

    Below is my reply to a “Jackie Chiles for president”  comment to this article on antiwar.com: https://news.antiwar.com/2024/05/16/zelensky-blames-the-world-for-russias-kharkiv-offensive/ Here is the "Jackie Chiles for president" comment: "Anyone that's not Russian on here, or paid by the Chinese? This place is scary, can we at least add a few pacifists, Nazi's, nihilist's and communists to balance the dialogue? RFK? I'm not even sure what he is. I'm against senseless wars and wasted national budgets to fund a war for elitist interests too but not at the cost of a world run by Xi and Putin. If you cheer lead those clowns, seek help. "What kind of an idiot are you? Where does this insane hostility towards Xi and Putin come from? ... that you've swallowed hook line and sinker?" ... and below is my response.  The issue which provokes my preserving and publishing the comment here is the series of triple parentheses, which are indications that...
    Post a Comment
    Read more