Skip to main content

Posted and then" removed" from comments to "Biden’s Top Asia Official Says US Engagement With China Is Over" at Antiwar.com

 Thomas,

Why was this removed when first posted? Is it the Unz reference or link? If you will point out the problem, I will fix it.

Or perhaps it wasn't you, but rather the same unseen hand that has "automatically", almost comprehensively, removed/cancelled/disappeared The Unz Review commentary from all social media ... and perhaps now Disqus as well?

******************

Here's the original post, with the Unz link replaced by the essay's title.

********************

"The" lab? Which lab is "the" lab? You of course mean the Wuhan lab, but really, is that "the" lab?

How about the North Carolina lab that Fauci admitted in Congressional testimony was doing Gain of Function research on bat corona viruses?

This discussion is infuriatingly -- despairingly might be a better descriptive -- infected by propagandized biases and media-generated, "perception management" reality alienation.

Angry as I am -- I'm tempted to slam all you guys as being unbearably stupid -- but I can't, because we live in a post-truth era with everyone victimized by spook-and-media executed "brain rape" on behalf of the ruling class. So everyone is blameless in their confusion.

Recall what William Casey, Ronald Reagon's CIA Director said: "We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false."

MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!!!

Does anyone believe that our war-mongering death merchants would ever willingly give up their quest for world conquest by any means, ie a bioweapon, if a bioweapon looked to be enabling?

When The Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) entered into force on 26 March 1975, those death merchants would have modified their approach, and rebranded bioweapons development as Gain of Function research, "explaining" it as necessary, as "defensive", as permitted. As a means of "understanding the danger and preparing a defense against a (real or manufactured) epidemic." After all, those sneaky commies were certainly going to take advantage, and continue THEIR evil work ... in secret. (Talk about projection!)

Enter psychopathic death merchant Pompeo under Trump: first as CIA Director and then as Sec of State.

So if you want to talk investigations and lack of cooperation, try getting samples and a full record of the GoF research, from the Carolina lab and the Wuhan lab, (and the Mossad labs), in order to compare the genetic codes of the bat corona viruses of the various samples to those of the Wuhan and Iranian outbreaks. Then, having attempted this ***genuinely comprehensive*** investigation -- not just a fraudulent investigation designed to brand China responsible -- then, we can talk about "cooperation", and "falsifiability".

Till then, I'm going with Ron Unz and so should you: Breaking the Silence on the Origins of Covid-19

    • Comments

    Post a Comment

    Popular posts from this blog

    re censorship at antiwar.com

    Really, Thomas? Who is the drama queen here? You're embarrassing yourself with this name calling. My comment disappeared. What am I to think, you're on a coffee break? So I posted the link to my backup, my all-but-invisible, low-traffic,... make that no-traffic,... blog. The "rules" you cite give the Jews a free pass on their complicity in the Zionist project. It's ok to criticize Zionism or Israel, but not the Jews that make their crimes possible. That appears to be the rule, and it amounts to Antiwar.com caving to Jewish/Zionist intimidation. It may be discretion -- as in "discretion is the better part of valor" -- but absent the lethality of bullets-and-bombs-combat, it's cowardly. It was cowardly then, as it is cowardly now. That said, it ***IS*** Justin's website and he gets to decide on when "discretion" -- strategic restraint -- is called for. I've had this issue since before you were moderator. Someone Jewis...
    Post a Comment
    Read more

    Right to exist, right to self-defense.....not!

    The following is a post I made to The Algemeiner, an online Jewish publication, in response to "Golda Meir was no J-Streeter", http://www.algemeiner.com/2015/09/08/golda-meir-was-no-j-streeter/#comment-4474211. Like many Jewish publications The Algemeiner has a limited tolerance for the truth when the truth is critical of Israel and its supporters, and so, not surprisingly, the comment was deleted by "moderation". I reprint it here for your consideration. ************************** Make no mistake, I’m an American and a Jew. For those of you thoroughly infected with the Judiasm-destroying poison of Zionism, here is the antidote to your Kool-aid dreams. Drink deeply and wake up to reality. We often hear the phrase “Israel’s right to exist” and along with it, “Israel’s right to self-defense.” Hear them endlessly, by propagandists who repeat them endlessly. But endless repetition does not make a thing true. The phantom “legiti...
    Post a Comment
    Read more

    Political Self-Immolation

    "What is relevant is Donald Jr's INTENT. In his email response (I am paraphrasing, but you can verify) he says, if the offer of dirt on Hillary is true, I love it! The intent behind this statement is loud and clear." I agree with you that this is the heart of the matter, and like you I am surprised that the so few of the anti-Trump people have zeroed in on this crucial element. Good on you for bringing it front and center. Let's take a look. Trump jr gets an email that says, "We've got dirt on HRC from the Russian govt, and we want to share it with you as part of Russia/Putin's effort to help Trump win the presidency." (This may not be absolutely the precise wording, but this will be the most aggressive/damning "parsing".) Then Trump jr says, "I love it, bring it on." This will be spun as Trump jr declaring his willingness and his INTENT (your caps) to collude, and as the very first substantive act in the process of collusi...
    Post a Comment
    Read more