Skip to main content

Comment to https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/why-hasnt-biden-rejoined-the-iran-deal/#comment-5288651628

I have to assume that you are a person of good faith, and therefore set aside my outrage at the damage you have done ... the damage you have done because you are insane. Your cult-like partisanship was "triggered" by Trump's defeat of Hillary and drove you insane. I wish I could feel sympathy for you, but there is a reason the insane are put in an asylum, because having them run around free is a danger to society. That's the situation we are in today. You and the rest of the insane, incoherently furious, are running around burning the place down.

I don't have time -- in truth I think it futile -- to have a discussion with you. When ***your*** world is in ruins, with you sitting amidst the rubble, you will still not "get it". Sad.

The good news is that, in ***my*** world, far away from the madness, I am prosperous and safe, and somewhat connected to reality.

Because you want to be a good person and help to make the world a better place -- but more, because others may read this and profit by it -- I will offer one example of your problem and the tragedy it has wrought.

If the world's leading authority on corona viruses, Dr, Didier Raoult, at the very beginning of the pandemic, had stood at the lectern of the MSM and advised on a treatment strategy, half of all the Covid deaths could have been prevented. Instead, it was Trump who stood at that lectern and delivered Dr. Raoult's recommendation. Then your insane Trump-hate took over, discrediting the recommendation of the world's foremost authority on corona viruses, resulting in the unnecessary deaths of perhaps 150,000 people. Your Trump-hate killed those people. You killed those people. But of course, you were "distressed". As you still are.

Interesting times.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

re censorship at antiwar.com

Really, Thomas? Who is the drama queen here? You're embarrassing yourself with this name calling. My comment disappeared. What am I to think, you're on a coffee break? So I posted the link to my backup, my all-but-invisible, low-traffic,... make that no-traffic,... blog. The "rules" you cite give the Jews a free pass on their complicity in the Zionist project. It's ok to criticize Zionism or Israel, but not the Jews that make their crimes possible. That appears to be the rule, and it amounts to Antiwar.com caving to Jewish/Zionist intimidation. It may be discretion -- as in "discretion is the better part of valor" -- but absent the lethality of bullets-and-bombs-combat, it's cowardly. It was cowardly then, as it is cowardly now. That said, it ***IS*** Justin's website and he gets to decide on when "discretion" -- strategic restraint -- is called for. I've had this issue since before you were moderator. Someone Jewis...

Right to exist, right to self-defense.....not!

The following is a post I made to The Algemeiner, an online Jewish publication, in response to "Golda Meir was no J-Streeter", http://www.algemeiner.com/2015/09/08/golda-meir-was-no-j-streeter/#comment-4474211. Like many Jewish publications The Algemeiner has a limited tolerance for the truth when the truth is critical of Israel and its supporters, and so, not surprisingly, the comment was deleted by "moderation". I reprint it here for your consideration. ************************** Make no mistake, I’m an American and a Jew. For those of you thoroughly infected with the Judiasm-destroying poison of Zionism, here is the antidote to your Kool-aid dreams. Drink deeply and wake up to reality. We often hear the phrase “Israel’s right to exist” and along with it, “Israel’s right to self-defense.” Hear them endlessly, by propagandists who repeat them endlessly. But endless repetition does not make a thing true. The phantom “legiti...

Political Self-Immolation

"What is relevant is Donald Jr's INTENT. In his email response (I am paraphrasing, but you can verify) he says, if the offer of dirt on Hillary is true, I love it! The intent behind this statement is loud and clear." I agree with you that this is the heart of the matter, and like you I am surprised that the so few of the anti-Trump people have zeroed in on this crucial element. Good on you for bringing it front and center. Let's take a look. Trump jr gets an email that says, "We've got dirt on HRC from the Russian govt, and we want to share it with you as part of Russia/Putin's effort to help Trump win the presidency." (This may not be absolutely the precise wording, but this will be the most aggressive/damning "parsing".) Then Trump jr says, "I love it, bring it on." This will be spun as Trump jr declaring his willingness and his INTENT (your caps) to collude, and as the very first substantive act in the process of collusi...