Skip to main content

Censored once again. This time from AW.C's " Robert Kagan Diagnosed America’s Biggest Problem: Americans Who Don’t Want To Run the World"

Bandow dare not name the criminal monster at the heart of the issue, lest he be cast out of the heaven of lawful discourse into the hell of despised truth-tellers.

"America is Israel's bitch." That's how I usually say it. But for Kagan and Nuland and the rest of the treasonous Neocons, America must be Israel's Luca Brasi: big, stupid, brutal, with a "loyalty" characterized by slavish obedience.

The criminal Zionists, the treasonous Zionists, the life-sucking parasitic Zionists, are exemplified by Kagan and Nuland and the rest of the Neocon cancer that infects the US as they have infected so many "hosts" over the last 5-thousand years. But Bandow dare not speak that truth.

So we remain infected by those who must never be named. Infected unto the death of the republic. And so we have the Kagan call to arms, the Kagan, Albright, Nuland et al call to national suicide:

"We must fight them over there so we don't have to fight them over here."

The truth:

"We must fight them over there so Israel doesn't have to fight them over there."

Recall the fate of Luca Brasi, and then recall fate of the Jews over their long history of tribal supremacy and "exceptionalism". In truth, their long history of attempted suicide-by-goy.

Silence will eventually come to an end, as it always does.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Terrorism" and other manipulations

From The Next Big Future, which I believe is Brian Wang's website/blog (I'm new at this stuff) , I find a piece entitled Terrorism is a subset of Murder http://nextbigfuture.com/2011/03/terrorism-is-subset-of-murder.html (asserting, if I get it right, that Terrorism is illegitimate by virtue of being criminal). One commenter, Gigi, responded: As I have already tried to say before, I consider any use of the word “terrorism” more or less pointless. In fact, reading much of the western media about “terrorism” there is almost nowhere any clear definition of the word “terrorism”, for the simple reason that for any kind of such definition many of the military actions taken by the West against unarmed civilians in, say, Iraq or Vietnam may well fall in this definition. Is this an action of terrorism? http://boingboing.net/2010/04/... Simply put it, if Hamas kills one Israeli civilian it is terrorism, if the US or Israel directly kill 10 or more Palestinian it is ...
2 comments
Read more

AW.C moderation back-up 5/16/2018

The Zionists, through their American fifth column, have bought and repurposed the US govt since 1948 (if not before). Congress is owned/subverted by AIPAC, with money from the hoodwinked US J*wish community, to serve Israeli interests ahead of American interests. And they own the State Dept -- and with it US foreign policy -- through more numerous and more abundantly-funded policy shops in DC. This "ownership" has been in effect through US administrations at least back to Truman, but you, addicted to Trump-hate, insist on making it about Trump. It is the opposition to Trump, the opposition by folks like you, in your refusal to help rebuild America, in your petulance and emotional self-indulgence, that drove Trump into the arms of the worst of America's domestic enemies. Trump's failure to drain the swamp falls squarely at the feet of those like you, who refused to support the President in his efforts to fix America. Have a peacef...
Post a Comment
Read more

The movement to free Julian Assange

In response to a similar comment by  ISHKABIBBLE   /   FEBRUARY 18, 2019 on Caitlin Johnstone's Website: https://caitlinjohnstone.com/2019/02/18/watch-my-speech-on-assanges-persecution-for-whistle-blowing-wikileaks-the-future-of-democracy/#comment-9130 I am comprehensively in agreement with you. For the last two or three years, I have entertained the same idea. So let me now expand on your — and my — suggestion. First of all, this undertaking should be done completely out in the open. There should be no secrecy involved. It should be a mass, overt, worldwide effort, with invitations to assemble in London for the event sent out to all those who support Assange. There should be no question whatsoever that it is an in-your-face repudiation and challenge to the British “Establishment”/Deep State. The action would be nothing less than a “Declaration of Independence” issued by the people of the world against the craven and unlawful imprisonment of by the UK...
Post a Comment
Read more