Skip to main content

Censored comment to the article in The National Interest "Israel Uses Its Firepower, Far and Wide"

After several attempts to post the following comment to:


Only to have it marked as spam and deleted by hasbarist aYid, I'm posting it here to preserve it and keep it available.

This sort of hasbara is yet another element of the Zionist pathology which, in the final analysis is completely consistent with the five-thousand year unrelenting Jewish effort at suicide-by-Goy. Modern Israel as with ancient Israel is its own existential threat.
The feature of Jewish culture which makes anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism both predictable and justifiable is the identification of all non-Jews as "The Other" bent on Jewish annihilation, as a precondition and justification for unrelenting aggression against them. It also creates the self-fulfilling prophecy of inevitable "push-back" again Jewish aggression.
Finally, the hasbara, originating as it does from a self-serving mythology, alienates its practitioners from reality, inducing a form of insanity. This insanity severely compromises one's ability to act rationally and effectively in one's self-defense.
The end is coming for Israel. While nuclear weapons get all the press, the real threat comes from (relatively) cheaply produced conventional missile technology, now equipped with pin-point accuracy guidance systems. These guidance systems are now being manufactured by the thousands, and the inventory of unguided missiles is being retro-fitted. Launched by the thousands at Israel's military assets, they will overwhelm Israel's anti-missile defenses and cripple Israel's defensive capability, bringing about the end of Israel.
The current perception of Israeli security and invincibility is an illusion. The coming defeat of Israel will be swift, and because of the strength of the hasbara narrative, it will take almost everyone by surprise.
For the record, I'm an American and a Jew, just not a hasbara-disabled Jewish tribal criminal.
It doesn't have to be this way. But us-them tribalism -- the 5000 year unrelenting practice of the Jews -- can only lead, as it has always predictably led, to one end. So it will be yet again if the Jews don't come to their senses, which they will not.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

9/11: Saudis, Israelis, and Zionist captivity

From:  Sens. Graham, McCain Unveil Plan to Weaken Saudi 9/11 Bill http://news.antiwar.com/2016/11/30/sens-graham-mccain-unveil-plan-to-weaken-saudi-911-bill/ My reply to pensword re Saudi/Israeli involvement in 9/11: I agree, both the Saudi and Israeli govts were involved: the Saudis in financing and the Israelis in "shepherding". A separate, overarching, and much more difficult matter however, is the subversion of the US govt by the Israelis. The Neocons -- Israeli agents -- currently control the Executive(Trump may boot them, we shall see.), and AIPAC -- Israeli agents -- has for many years maintained ownership of the House and Senate. Breaking out of Zionist "captivity" is a yuuuge challenge. Consider, its mention is taboo in the MSM media, dangerous in the alternate media, and a life destroying, career-killing offense in politics, media, academia, commerce,... hell, across the spectrum of civil and cultural participation. The Jews have once aga...

re censorship at antiwar.com

Really, Thomas? Who is the drama queen here? You're embarrassing yourself with this name calling. My comment disappeared. What am I to think, you're on a coffee break? So I posted the link to my backup, my all-but-invisible, low-traffic,... make that no-traffic,... blog. The "rules" you cite give the Jews a free pass on their complicity in the Zionist project. It's ok to criticize Zionism or Israel, but not the Jews that make their crimes possible. That appears to be the rule, and it amounts to Antiwar.com caving to Jewish/Zionist intimidation. It may be discretion -- as in "discretion is the better part of valor" -- but absent the lethality of bullets-and-bombs-combat, it's cowardly. It was cowardly then, as it is cowardly now. That said, it ***IS*** Justin's website and he gets to decide on when "discretion" -- strategic restraint -- is called for. I've had this issue since before you were moderator. Someone Jewis...

The (((truth)))) you are not allowed to tell.

Below is my reply to a “Jackie Chiles for president”  comment to this article on antiwar.com: https://news.antiwar.com/2024/05/16/zelensky-blames-the-world-for-russias-kharkiv-offensive/ Here is the "Jackie Chiles for president" comment: "Anyone that's not Russian on here, or paid by the Chinese? This place is scary, can we at least add a few pacifists, Nazi's, nihilist's and communists to balance the dialogue? RFK? I'm not even sure what he is. I'm against senseless wars and wasted national budgets to fund a war for elitist interests too but not at the cost of a world run by Xi and Putin. If you cheer lead those clowns, seek help. "What kind of an idiot are you? Where does this insane hostility towards Xi and Putin come from? ... that you've swallowed hook line and sinker?" ... and below is my response.  The issue which provokes my preserving and publishing the comment here is the series of triple parentheses, which are indications that...