Skip to main content
Censored from Anti-war.com

The Zionists stole Palestine, murdered and expelled Palestinians, lie about it to cover up their crimes, and bankroll virtually the entire MSM to relentlessly repeat those lies. Possibly worst of all is the comprehensive subversion of the United States which they have achieved by the simple expedient of buying/bribing/threatening the Senate and House. Sadly, the American Jewish community has become complicit in the Zionist subversion -- yet again demonstrating the historically persistent "dual loyalty" problem -- by bankrolling the subversion.
The American Jewish community was, for the first hundred years, hoodwinked into thinking that the Zionist project was both pragmatic and just. Now that the internet has revealed the essential and criminal nature of Zionism, many in the American Jewish community, particularly the young, are beginning to turn against the Zionist project, but the majority, the older folks, continue their support. As they have for five-thousand years, the tribe supports the tribe, even in its suicidal criminality. Will the millenium-long pattern of attempted suicide-by-goy finally be blunted, turned back, and brought to an end,... before the next holocaust? Will the Jews finally learn? As an American and a Jew, I certainly hope so.
You, Don?


  •  
  • Comments

    Popular posts from this blog

    "Terrorism" and other manipulations

    From The Next Big Future, which I believe is Brian Wang's website/blog (I'm new at this stuff) , I find a piece entitled Terrorism is a subset of Murder http://nextbigfuture.com/2011/03/terrorism-is-subset-of-murder.html (asserting, if I get it right, that Terrorism is illegitimate by virtue of being criminal). One commenter, Gigi, responded: As I have already tried to say before, I consider any use of the word “terrorism” more or less pointless. In fact, reading much of the western media about “terrorism” there is almost nowhere any clear definition of the word “terrorism”, for the simple reason that for any kind of such definition many of the military actions taken by the West against unarmed civilians in, say, Iraq or Vietnam may well fall in this definition. Is this an action of terrorism? http://boingboing.net/2010/04/... Simply put it, if Hamas kills one Israeli civilian it is terrorism, if the US or Israel directly kill 10 or more Palestinian it is

    Ethics vs tribal criminality

    Israel is a geopolitical crime-in-progress. No crime has a right to exist, no criminals in the commission of a crime have the right to self-defense. They have the right to surrender to a competent authority, have the "issue" adjudicated by a fair judicial authority, and if found guilty to be subject to a proportionate penalty, and after having served their time, permitted once again to participate in lawful society. The greatest existential threat to Israel,... is Israel. I'm an American and a Jew, just not a supporter Zionist or American criminality. You, on the other hand appear to be utterly untouched by any taint of ethics outside criminal tribalism. Sad. Small detail: the Saudi oil production facilities can be destroyed with conventional explosives. Nukes not necessary.

    Trump is just the opening act

    The United States invented al-Qaeda in Afghanistan. By overthrowing Saddam, the United States enabled al-Qaeda in Iraq. The regime change attempt by CIA-supported Al-Qaeda terrorists in Syria enabled the resurgence of al-Qaeda in Syria, which then morphed into ISIS. The CIA regime-change proxy war forced the re-positioning of the Syrian Army to defensible positions. That meant a withdrawal from Eastern Syria and redeployment for the defense of the Damascus population centers. That in turn created the power vacuum in Eastern Syria that enabled the creation of ISIS in Syria, the re-invasion of Iraq, and the creation of the ISIS Caliphate. The Neocon-subverted/Israel-subverted US remains the world's foremost "useful idiot" state sponsor of jihadi terrorism,... on behalf of Israel. So the entire shjtstorm in the Mideast is entirely the result of the United States Neocon-dominated, State Department-directed foreign policy, which, simply put, is the United States acting as